While the ASJP has 40 entries, the Waray-Waray only includes 37.
The list is derived from the Swadesh 100, and the numbers are those of Swadesh.
The ASJP has its own <orthography>, their cap <N> = ng = IPA ŋ.
Accent never seems to be included in their transcriptions.
Glottal stop does not appear to have any symbol.
ENGLISH	Wichmann	R.D.Zorc	Explanation
come	kanhi	abot	English translation problem
fire	kayo	kalayo	Cebuano form given
hear	pamati’ & dungog	dungog	Synononyms available
louse	kuto & tuma	kuto	different species, *kutuh intended
mountain	MISSED	bukid	no entry given
new	bago	bag-o	glottal stop cluster missed
night	gabi	gab-i	glottal stop cluster missed
tree/wood	MISSED	kahoy	no entry given
you	ikaw	kamo	singular vs plural 2 pronoun
we	kita	kami	inclusive vs exclusive 1 pronoun
Zorc notes
‘come’ – I prefer PPH *qabut ‘come, arrive’ to Ceb-Waray kanhi. The deictics differ even in closely related dialects, while the verb is well-retained among many languages.
‘louse’ – normally the word for ‘head louse’ is intended which is PAN *kuCux, PPH *kutuh. PAN *CuməS, PPH *tumah refers to a ‘clothes louse’ or ‘body louse’. There is also another species, the ‘chicken louse’ which has wildly different etyma.
I don’t know why, but Wichmann did not include four items:
	‘tree’ (PAN *kaSiw, PCP *kahuy)
	‘horn’ (PPH *súngay | PAN *uRəŋ | PAN-F *səquŋ_
	‘knee’ (PAN *tuduS, PMP *túhud)
	‘mountain’ (PAN *bukij | PAN *búləd, PMP *qilih, PWMP *bulud
Since English ‘you’ can refer to either the singular (‘thou’ is archaic) or the plural, I prefer the plural form, Wichmann chose the singular.
Again, since English has only one ‘we’, Wichmann chose the inclusive, whereas I usually choose the exclusive sense.
Wichmann missed the glottal stop cluster in both ‘new’ and ‘night’.
Wichmann did not include any form of accentuation, whereas Zorc insists on it.